A fleet of agents,
one accountable system
Operations teams replace credential-sharing RPA sprawl with a governed fleet: every automation carries a named passport, acts inside segregation-of-duties policies, and writes to one audit trail your risk team can review — and approve.
Where autonomy breaks down today
Nobody can list the automations
Years of RPA, scripts, and now agents have left hundreds of processes running under recycled credentials. The first audit question — what is running, as whom — has no owner and no answer.
One automation can do a whole fraud
The same bot that creates a vendor can approve its invoice and schedule the payment. Segregation of duties, the oldest control in the book, quietly disappeared into automation.
Risk review is the bottleneck
Every new automation triggers a bespoke security review because there is no standard control envelope to point at. Six-week approval cycles kill the ROI that justified the project.
An invoice, with duties separated
A $4,300 invoice from a new vendor lands in accounts payable. procure-agent processes it — and the controls decide which parts it may do alone.
procure-agent matches the invoice
PassportUnder its own passport, the agent parses the invoice and finds the matching purchase order. Its scopes cover AP entry in the ERP — not vendor master data, not payment release.
The bill entry clears policy
Budgetap-controls allows netsuite.bill.create in 5 ms: three-way match confirmed, amount inside the agent's $5,000 per-invoice budget and monthly cap.
Vendor creation is someone else's duty
PolicyThe vendor is new, and policy encodes segregation of duties: the agent that enters bills may never create the vendor record. The request is held for the vendor-master owner.
The controller approves the vendor
ApprovalThe vendor-master owner verifies banking details out-of-band and approves creation from the queue. Only then does the bill entry complete downstream.
The whole flow is one verifiable chain
ReceiptMatch, entry, held vendor creation, approval, and completion are chained as signed receipts — a control narrative internal audit reads in minutes, not a sampling exercise.
Governance that scales to hundreds of agents
Define the control envelope once — identity, duties, budgets, approvals — and every new automation inherits it on day one.
Each agent's passport records its owner, scopes, and policies in one inventory — the answer to the audit question before it is asked.
Encode incompatible-duty rules — entry versus approval, creation versus release — and enforce them across the fleet at runtime.
Per-invoice, monthly, and cost-center caps keep autonomous spend inside the plan finance already signed.
ERP, HRIS, and internal tools write to the same hash-chained log, so a cross-system process reads as one story instead of five exports.
Representative outcomes reported by govern.sh customers in enterprise automation.
The controls your ICFR program expects
Segregation-of-duties policies and per-agent identities map directly to SOX IT general controls over access and change, while the hash-chained receipt trail gives internal audit full-population testing instead of samples. New automations launch inside a pre-approved control envelope, which is what turns risk review from weeks into days.
Internal audit used to sample twenty-five invoices a quarter and extrapolate. Now they verify the entire receipt chain in an afternoon, and the finding last quarter was literally 'no exceptions noted.' I have been waiting my whole career to read that sentence.
Related use cases
Put a verified agent to work in enterprise automation.
Mint a passport, attach a policy, and watch the first signed receipt land — free for your first three agents.